========================================================

ISAF Olympic Windsurfing Equipment Evaluation Event
3 - 8 May 2004 Torbole, Lake Garda,  ITALY
 
Latest News
 
The ISAF Olympic Windsurfing Equipment Evaluation Event, to be held on Lake Garda, Italy

from 3-8 May 2004 has attracted six manufacturers with eight designs of equipment.
In addition, there are currently two manufacturers, whose applications are being processed. Manufacturers and equipment attending the Evaluation Event are:

Boards and More: Mistral Prodigy, Mistral One-design, T.E, and the Olympic Design
Flying Fish: Exocet
Gaastra Sails: Prototype
Neil Pryde: Neil Pryde Formula
PD Project: Prototype
Starboard: Z-Class

In order to evaluate the equipment across a range of sailors, all ISAF Member National Authorities (MNA’s) were invited to nominate up to 2 sailors from their country to participate in the evaluation. Applications have been received from three continents, with Spain, Great Britain, Germany, Poland, France, Russia, Italy, Canada, Japan and Hong Kong nominating sailors to be in Torbole. In total there are sixteen sailors nominated by MNA’s, and all applications will be sent to the evaluation panel before the final sailors are selected.

Torbole on Lake Garda is renowned for being a windsurfing mecca and will provide conditions worthy of the level of sailor and equipment at this event. The event is being hosted at the Circolo Surf Vela in conjunction with the Italian Sailing Federation (Federazione Italiana de Vela – FIV).

The objective of the Equipment Evaluation Event is to identify suitable equipment to be selected for use at the 2008 Olympic Regatta, Beijing.

Design and manufacturer details will shortly be posted on the ISAF website. Following the link below provides more information on the design criteria.

 
ISAF Technical
www.sailing.org/technical
ISAF Olympic Windsurfing Equipment
Click Here
Olympic Windsurfing Equipment Evaluation Event
3 - 8 May 2004 Circolo Surf Torbole, Lake Garda,  ITALY
 
Wet And Windless Day One
 

Monday morning greeted sailors and manufacturers in Italy with overcast skies and light 8-knot northerly winds on the first day of this second evaluation event.

© ISAF
 
The Evaluation Panel, consisting of Rich JEFFRIES, Chris ATKINS, Qu CHUN, Mike GEBHARDT and Jorunn HORGEN first gave a welcoming briefing to the 18 sailors and 7 manufacturers before starting measurement of all of the boards.

As boards were measured some sailors took the opportunity to try out some of the new equipment entered to the trials. However, as they took to the water, rain came in and killed what was left of the northerly "Peler".

After lunch the Evaluation Team had scheduled two windward/leeward races for the boards, first having divided them up into male and female fleets. Unfortunately the rain persisted in keeping the breeze away until 1530 by which time it was considered too late to carry out any of the racing. Instead the sailors were given a free choice in the equipment and were allowed to carry out a free-sailing session. This was conducted in a building "Peler" breeze which rose to about 8-10 knots before dying away for the evening.

Members of the Evaluation Team were on hand to discuss the boards with each of the sailors as they came off the water. In the evening a dinner has been organised for the sailors and the manufacturers as a welcome to the region and to Torbole.

Today the forecast is for more rain but the traditional "Ora" is expected to show up and provide some healthier sailing conditions.


 
Event Website
Click Here
Olympic Windsurfing Equipment Evaluation Event
3 - 8 May 2004 Torbole, Lake Garda,  ITALY
 
Another Cold And Rainy Day In Torbole
 
Day two started out with light drizzle and about 12-15 knots of Peler blowing. The Race Committee set a windward-leeward course with two races planned in the morning session followed by two further races in the afternoon session.

© ISAF
 
In ideal conditions for the Formula boards, both the Gaastra and Neil Pryde equipment rounded all marks clear ahead of any other equipment. Despite not being able to point quite as high as the IMCO and other daggerboard equipment, their sheer speed and power enabled two wins early in the evaluation.

In the afternoon the Evaluation Panel wanted to test the light wind performance of the equipment, and therefore decided to move the course closer into the shore where the dying "Peler" made for tricky and light conditions of 3 - 7 knots.

This time it was the turn of the daggerboard boards to shine, in particular the IMCO boards with both the MOD and the new Olympic design leading the pack to the top mark. In fact the vulnerability of Formula boards in light winds was shown up even more when all of the IMCO boards had finished before any of the Formula boards had reached the top mark for the first time!

The Evaluation Panel have been noticing the differences between some of the prototype designs and have been interestingly listening to many of the varied points of view. In particular is the Exocet board from Flying Fish (pictured above), which looks to be a cross between a Raceboard and Kayak.

This board has not yet been able to shine in the conditions so far but with more traditional 15-20 knot winds forecast for today it may yet have its day.


 
Evaluation Event Microsite
Click Here
Related Articles
www.sailing.org/isafcal/search_news.asp?keyword=windtrials
Olympic Windsurfing Equipment Evaluation Event
3 - 8 May 2004 Torbole, Lake Garda,  ITALY
 
Major Differences In Performance
 
Tuesday's races made it clear to the Evaluation Panel that there are major differences in the boards performance. As many of the boards are of a similar type, Wednesday was dedicated to Comparative Testing.

© ISAF
 
The boards were put into groups of three similar boards and carried out straight line saiing characteristic testing to evaluate whether items such as sails, fins etc made a difference on each board’s speed and general sailing abilities.

Due to the 3-5 knot wind range, testing could only be carried out in the "Longboard" (Mistral OD, Olympic OD and Exocet) and the "Hybrid" (Mistral Prodigy, Starboard Z-Class and the PD Project) groups. The testing is based around all of the boards in the group lining up a couple of board lengths apart and then sailing on the same tack for 2-3 minutes. The group then stops, discuss how each board felt to sail and comment on the others sailing style and board/rig set-up. Any changes are then made to the equipment, which could involve changing sails, adjusting mast foot position etc, and then the group carry on sailing for another 2-3 minutes before repeating the whole scenario again.

This carried out for half an hour upwind before the group turn to repeat the exercise downwind for another half hour. The purpose of this type of testing is to see which board in each group is better and also to evaluate the different effects each type of equipment has on the board’s performance.

First the "Longboard" group carried out their testing with a few rig adjustments being made. In the light breezes the Mistral OD and the Olympic OD had a slight edge on the Exocet but as yesterdays racing showed in the slightly heavier airs, this advantage is quickly equaled.

Second to carry out the testing were the "Hybrid" group. This group consists of the boards that are either prototypes or do not really fall into any type of class category. Unlike the Formula boards, which are unable to plane or sail effectively in the light breezes, the Hybrid class, which utilise a daggerboard, are able to sail competitively in the light breezes whilst also retaining good upwind capabilities.

Testing was carried out in the morning session only due to the persistent rain cancelling out the light southerly breeze as the afternoon wore on. Tomorrow sees more rain in the morning with some sunshine in the afternoon. As the air gets warmer in the afternoon tomorrow, the sailors should see more typical Lake Garda conditions emerging which will introduce a whole new area of testing to the Evaluation Panel.


 
Event Website
www.sailing.org/sc.asp?ID=Windsurfing_Evaluation_Events
Related Articles
www.sailing.org/isafcal/search_news.asp?keyword=windtrials
 
ISAF Olympic Windsurfing Equipment Evaluation Event
3 - 8 May 2004 Torbole, Lake Garda,  ITALY
 
Storms and Testing On Day 4
 
Today looked more promising for the traditional Lake Garda winds to fill in.
With the rain holding off and the skies clearing somewhat many of the local Circolo Surf Torbole staff members were predicting that the "Ora" may makes its first appearance of the week.

Having enjoyed a superb Gala Dinner last night, hosted by San Pellegrino and the Rotari winery, many of the sailors were glad that the sailing was postponed due to the lack of wind upon arrival for the 0930 briefing.

After not being able to complete the comparative testing yesterday, the sailors were sent out in a building southerly breeze at around 1300. Just as testing commenced a large storm came over bringing with it strong 15-20 knot winds and ideal testing conditions.

The Evaluation Panel were advised to make all sailors return to the beach due to the threat of hail and excess winds from the storm, unfortunately missing out on sailing in the some excellent conditions.

As the storm started to clear, the Lake was left with more light breezes of 5-6 knots which eventually died down to nothing by 1530.

However, the Hybrid group did manage to get out and make one testing session, showing off the boards’ capabilities to sail in the lightest of breezes equalling that of the Mistral OD, whilst also showing good "Formula" style sailing in the moderate breezes shown earlier in the week.

© ISAF

On land, the Evaluation Panel have almost concluded their manufacturers meetings with only Neil Pryde being left to talk to them.

The Evaluation Panel has been assessing each of the entries for class structure, building techniques and various other technical considerations that will all need to be taken into consideration whilst selecting the equipment for the 2008 Olympic Regatta in Beijing.

Tomorrow is another day of unexpected weather whilst Saturday is looking to provide the best sailing conditions yet.


 
Event Website
www.sailing.org/sc.asp?ID=Windsurfing_Evaluation_Events
Related Articles
www.sailing.org/isafcal/search_news.asp?keyword=windtrials
 
ISAF Olympic Windsurfing Equipment Evaluation
3 - 8 May 2004 Torbole,  ITALY
 
Day Five Sees Good Breeze On Lake Garda
 
Good sailing conditions allowed a full day of testing from the Circolo Surf Torbole on Lake Garda with a southerly breeze of between 6 and 18 knots. Perfect Ora conditions.
There were only a couple of rain showers and comparative testing of long boards, Formula boards and hybrids ontinued under the guidance of Mike GEBHARDT and Jorunn HORGEN.

On land, the Evaluation Panel’s meeting with Neil Pryde representatives concluded their meetings with manufacturers.

160 Formula boards are gathering at the Circolo Surf Torbole for the Formula European Championship which starts on Monday 10th.

The Evaluation Panel will spend Saturday preparing a report to the ISAF Events Committee at the Mid-Year meeting to be held in San Diego from 4-6 June.


 
ISAF Olympic Windsurfing Equipment Trials
Click Here
 
Curtis Olympic Fin Submissions

May 6, 2004
Hi All,
Before the newest developments arrived at Lake Garda today I had the only Curtis "Olympic Prototype" fin. I got it on Tuesday and did all the appropriated QA. It conforms to all aspects of the specifications. Today I got to test it! I arrived at Buckroe Beach in Hampton, Virginia USA to winds of about 4 knots. I rigged my 12.5 and installed the new fin which happens to be the smallest of 3 designs now in Italy. The thermal that was supposed to build just shifted the wind direction from NE to SE. The wind dropped to 2-3 knots by the time I hit the water. I shlogged for a while, then came in and waited. 40 minutes later I went out again. The wind was now about 4 to 5 knots. I managed to get quite far off the beach. Note the wind was onshore. I nearly pumped onto a plane a few times.
I came back in, then launched again. This time the wind was about 5.5 knots and building slightly. I planed off right away and was able to work my way upwind. As the wind built so did my speed and angle. Off the wind the fin was very controllable. The wind peaked well before a white cap was to be seen. Maybe it hit 7 knots.
I'm sure I would not have planed with a normal formula size fin. This fin extended the wind minimum down about 1-2 knots so I think we may hear some exciting news from Lake Garda over the next few days. Above are 3 of the new Curtis fins. The fin in the center is the new smallest of the new Olympic submission prototypes. The two others are new formula fins that are 70cm for reference. Notice the center fin is still WET!
Stay tuned. See ya on the water.
Dave Kashy - VA9


---------
 
EXOCET Olympic concept update
May 6th, 2004



The ISAF Olympic Evaluation Trials are going on in Torbole (Italy) , and the EXOCET concept has already raise the eyebrows of officials and testers !!! Being much faster than a Formula board in non planing conditions, and better than the current Olympic design in planing conditions, the innovative EXOCET Olympic concept could prove the best for competitive windsurfing in both very light and stronger winds.
You can also read the reports from the ISAF Olympic Evaluation Trials here:
  ISAF website
  AEROTECH sails forum
Here are some new pictures of the EXOCET prototype :




 Or maybe :

http://www.exocet-original.com/article.php3?id_article=178



compared to the Starboard Z-class prototype :

 


 =======================================================

Original 2003 IWA White Paper -
"ROUTE MAP" TO THE SELECTION OF THE 2008 OLYMPIC EQUIPMENT

AIM
The aim of this report is to
 
a) define the IWA (and thus its membership) recommendations on the selection of Olympic windsurfing equipment to be used at the Olympic Regattas of 2008 & 2012;
 
b) to ensure that windsurfing retaining its Olympic status for both men and women;
 
c) and that the most appropriate equipment is put forward by the IWA for selection by the MNAs. This report therefore aims to set out criteria and a design brief so that an additional development path be considered in parallel with the current IMCO and FW formats.  The development path herewith proposed would allow the ISAF to consider a wider choice of alternatives in the light of the critical factors highlighted in the background section.
 
KEY ISSUES
 
a) It is very important that the majority of MNAs agree that windsurfing is included in the Olympic Regatta and support the ISAF Windsurfing Committee's recommendations on the most appropriate Olympic windsurfing equipment to select:
 
b) All windsurfing classes and the PWA actively promote a unified policy on the "2008 equipment". No class or class official should express a dissenting view in public.
 
BACKGROUND
 
Windsurfing has been an "event" within the Olympic sailing regatta for almost 20 years. There are currently two sets of medals, one for men and one for women. It is currently the least expensive Olympic sailing discipline; therefore apart from being a potentially spectacular to watch its inclusion ensures that a lot of developing nations can take part (60% of the entry in 1996).
 
Whilst remaining very technical equipment with a well-developed & valid format, IMCO is losing its sparkle. It is fair to say that the majority view within the current Olympic class is that the Mistral One Design should be replaced after the 2004 Olympics and that more than one manufacturer should produce the replacement equipment.
 
Here are some background facts that help the reader to understand more fully the reasoning behind the conclusions of this report:
 
a) The ISAF President has already stated that he believes that the class selected should be Formula Windsurfing but that the equipment to be used at the Games should be One Design;
 
b) There is little enthusiasm amongst the FW racers for a One Design format as evidenced by the low number of registrations for the so-called "One Design Formula" event at the 2002 ISAF World Sailing Games.
 
c) - The Spanish Sailing Federation (RFEV) made a submission last year stating that both the equipment and the class should be changed for 2008.
 
d) The President of the RFEV has since written to the ISAF saying that he has changed its mind and now does not support the Formula concept but does support a change in the equipment.
 
e) The historic data for wind speeds in Qing Dao for July & September may not support a proposal to move the whole Olympic Games to a date in September. It is therefore unlikely that the political momentum for a change of dates will build up inside the ISAF or the IOC.
 
f) It is believed that in certain areas, the waters in Qing Dao have quite strong currents and that the historic data for wind speeds in July show a low average wind speed.
 
g) Any proposal to change the dates requires the summer sports federations to convince the IOC that a move is necessary. The IOC would then be required to re-negotiate its TV distribution & media rights deals. July is a more valuable period from the point of view of the value of media rights than September.  BOCOG will not make any requests to the IOC themselves.  A decision to move the Games is therefore unlikely.
 
h) There is now a written threat from a powerful MNA (France) to lobby against windsurfing as an Olympic event.
 
PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CRITERIA
 
It is recommended that the selection of windsurfing equipment is based on the following criteria:
 
Racing is possible at the same time as other Olympic Sailing Classes;
 
Reason:
 
In many major Olympic Class Regattas worldwide, the Olympic windsurfing class has to compete at the same time and in the same conditions as the other sailing classes;
 
The likely conditions to be expected in Qing Dao 2008
 
Reason:
 
Not to do so would be impractical;
 
It is a strictly controlled restricted class;
 
Reasons:
 
This goes a long way towards supporting the position of the ISAF President, whilst permitting differences between items of equipment within very tight tolerances;
 
This will be more interesting to manufacturers than a "One Design" concept;
 
The Olympics should be a test of talent not technology;
 
To maximize commonality between men's & women's equipment (KISS);
 
To strictly limit the cost of participation;
 
Production licences to be controlled and issued by the ISAF:
 
The decision on the actual equipment is made at the 2004 ISAF November Conference
 
Reasons:
 
To allow racers and MNAs to build up a long term experience of the chosen format;
 
To allow MNAs to invest in new equipment with confidence;
 
To allow MNAs to plan long term development programmes with confidence;
 
e) The existing criteria established by the ISAF Events Committee in November 1999
 
being:
 
Must allow athletes around the world, of different size and weight, male and female, to participate;
 
Must achieve the IOC objective of a minimum of 30% participation for women;
 
Must give the best sailors in each country the opportunity to participate in readily accessible equipment;
 
Must combine both traditional and modern events and classes, to reflect, display and promote competitive sailing.
 
General Design Brief  for NEW OLYMPIC EQUIPMENT:
 
The equipment definitions for both men and women shall be the same where possible;
 
Reason:
 
to enable women to reach high levels of performance by training and possibly racing with men on equal terms;
 
to maximize development opportunities;  
 
To reduce the number of equipment components required to establish a viable Olympic programme and thus reduce the overall cost of such a programme;
 
The equipment shall conform with the criteria specified above andÅ 
 
be supported by a global distribution network or networks;
 
be accompanied by clearly defined measurement rules & tight tolerances;
 
be restricted to 1 board, 2 fins, 1 centerboard & 2 rigs per competitor.
 
3 The method of construction employed shall be durable and of a consistently uniform high quality whilst offering the best trade off between weight > performance > price.
 
4.The ideal weight band for men should be 70>82 Kgs and for women should be 55>70 Kgs;
 
5. Safety shall be considered so that
 
competitors will be able to sail home unassisted in sub-racing or quickly increasing winds wind speeds;
 
boards are designed to perform in large waves and chop in a "well-behaved" way;
 
each rig is as durable & as light as possible whilst being easy to rig/derig at sea;
 
The fin shall be easily demountable without the aid of tools;
 
6. Attention should be paid to the possibility of using the same hull(s) combined with smaller rigs so that a global junior racing programme can be established at minimal cost.
 
Design brief HULL:
 
Easily transportable by normal scheduled airline as passenger's excess baggage;
 
Max Weight bare hull weight 12 kg/ minimum bare hull weight 9kgs;
 
Retractable centre board allowed;
 
2 production fins, easily removable without tools;
 
Strong Durable Construction; Positive flotation in case the board is holed;
 
Easily repairable on a regatta site;
 
Construction method and materials to be identical around the world.
 
Price around USD 1200 retail
 
Design brief RIG(s):
 
Two rigs for women, each of a different defined size;
 
Men to use the same two rigs sizes if possible;
 
If not, men shall use two rigs, each of a different defined size;
 
Same carbon mast for all rigs (commonality of components);
 
Same Carbon boom for all rigs (commonality of components);
 
Each rig to have the maximum flexibility in terms of wind range (trim systems);
 
The largest women's rig (max. size) to be easily manageable by someone of 55 kg;
 
Sails to be made " as visible as possible " to the naked eye from a great distance; 
 
DESIGN AND TEST EVENT
 
Option A
 
That the ISAF invite key manufacturers/brands to participate in a design competition leading to a test event in order to select one board prototype with two matching rig sizes around which tight tolerances can be defined so that new equipment can be selected for use at the 2008 and 2012 Olympic Games that meets the above criteria. Manufacturers/Brands who participate in this development will have the right to build/market the Olympic equipment.
 
Option B
 
That the ISAF make an "open invitation" to any board shapers whether they be involved with a current "known" production board brand or not to put forward one prototype each at its "intended production weight" for evaluation at an ISAF test event in order to select one board prototype with two matching rig sizes around all of which tight tolerances can be defined so that new equipment can be selected for use at the 2008 and 2012 Olympic Games that meets the above criteria.
 
Conditions:
 
i) The winning board/rigs will be made in established factories licensed by ISAF; Said factories will be subject to a regular manufacturing audit to ensure that the building specification is being tightly adhered to;
 
ii) To stimulate the custom board shaping community, the IWA should establish a sizeable prize fund for the best proposed board in the opinion of the ISAF evaluation working party put forward by a custom shaper not already associated with a board brand with a registered production board on the ISAF list;
 
iv) Any board that later becomes a "production board" registered on the ISAF  List shall pay the associated fee; Registration  regulations for all such boards will be strengthened;
 
v) Brands who wish to market the selected board/rigs may do so by paying a sponsorship fee per unit sponsored to the IWA for their logo to be put on the Olympic board. This will allow
 
Sponsored riders to compete on equipment branded with their sponsor's logos in all regattas except the Olympic Games where the board shall be "white" (no logos);
 
Sponsors from the wider world of commerce and industry to participate.
 
NB - The selected option should be initiated as quickly as possible;
 
      - The prize fund suggested under "Option B" would be established by drawing down funds from the balances accrued by the classes managing the Olympic equipment over the last 20 years.
 
KEY ISAF DEADLINES
 
1) 2002
 
a) IWA classes submit this report to ISAF with a list of  MNAs by July 31st
 
b) ISAF agrees the selection criteria for Olympic equipment at their November Conference
 
2) 2003
 
a) IWA classes make a submission to ISAF that "Windsurfing" is an Olympic "Event" for men and women with a list of  supporting MNAs by July 31st
 
b)  ISAF select the "Events"  for the 2008 Olympic Regatta.
 
3)  2004
 
a) IWA classes make a submission to ISAF that the criteria, which best meets the criteria be selected for the 2008 Olympic Regatta with a list of supporting MNAs by July 31st
 
b) ISAF select the "equipment"  for the 2008 Olympic Regatta.
 

=============================================
 
Ref:  Boards & More GmbH response to the IWA White Paper
 
Dear Ceri,
 
Many thanks for forwarding the IWA White Paper on the
selection of equipment for 2008 and the associated
criteria & procedures to us.
 
At Boards & More GmbH, we have considered this in
detail and have the following comments to make:
 
1.       Sails & rig components:  the idea that many
different brands can make and market the defined
Olympic sail sizes and components is an interesting
one. We support this concept;
 
2.       Boards:
a.   It is the opinion of Boards & More GmbH that the
current Olympic board is the most suitable existing
equipment for the Olympics 2008 in
China.   Boards &
More stands fully behind the continued production of
the Mistral One Design. We shall continue to produce
the board as long as there are customers willing to buy
it.
 
b.    However, if  the ISAF and its Member National
Authorities wish to select more modern equipment for
the Olympic windsurfing discipline, we are more than
happy to produce a new, light-weight dedicated race
board for the purpose.
 
In our view, a centerboard is a fundamental requirement
for such a board, which should also be based on the
latest design thinking to ensure racing in the same
conditions as those in which the other Olympic Sailing
Classes compete.
 
We appreciate that, in ideal circumstances, it might be
reasonable to have a great many different facilities
involved in the production of the board.  However, the
reality is that there are probably only two factories
in the world (Boards & More and Bic) who could
undertake such a production and reach the consistently
uniform and high standard of quality required by
sailors at the Olympic level.
 
Boards & More has gained over more than a decade's
extensive experience as the supplier of the current
Olympic equipment and has a unique fund of in-house
production know-how built up over more than 20 years.
We are happy to make hulls in our production facility
for other brands.
 
c.   We also believe that the Formula Windsurfing
format as it currently stands is not suitable for
Olympic competition for two main reasons:
 
i. the equipment is very expensive using large fins
(60 - 70 cms) made from pre-preg carbon, 100% carbon
masts and booms, and sails that are very specialised;
 
ii.  and unless you have equipment that is right at the
cutting edge, the absolute best stuff, then fair and
equitable racing  cannot take place in effective
wind-speeds of less than 9 knots.
 
d.   The idea of a producing the Olympic hull as a
"white board" for other brands (whether they are
currently in windsurfing or not) to use as a marketing
vehicle is an interesting one, which we also support.
 
Boards & More GmbH is dedicated to continuing its
support of the ISAF and its MNAs started by Mistral in
1992 and believe that windsurfing adds great value to
the Olympic sailing family supported as it is by
nations rich and poor from all over the world.
 
Yours sincerely,
Boris Zwetkoff
Business Unit Manager Windsurf
cc  Arve Sundheim / ISAF;    Aaron Botzer / ISAF;    Rich Jeffries / ISAF;   
Greg Johns / IMCO; Rory Ramsden /IMCO
 
==================================
Interview with Patrice Belbeoc'h : sail and board developer for EXOCET
"Exactly ! The new concept should be performant in 2 to 8 knots, a centerboard or dagger is so far the only answer to that problem. It will also give the security to any event organizer that the race will take place. Don't also forget that this is a support where the boards will be bought in most cases by parents and it should be used in all condition and by the whole family."   - see :
http://www.exocet-original.com/news/article.php3?id_article=208
==================================
 
 

1